HULMEVILLE ROAD over NESHAMINY CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.14138, -74.9125840°08'29" N, 74°54'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HULMEVILLE ROAD over NESHAMINY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000007041 |
Old structure number: | 090513011008280 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | HULMEVILLE BORO 42C04 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 99.1 ft. [30.2 m] |
Total length: | 293.0 ft. [89.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.4 ft. [12.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 48.2 ft. [14.7 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1989 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 16,088 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 71.6 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 16088 | 71.6 |
March 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 16181 | 65.6 |
March 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 16139 | 65.6 |
March 2011 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 15707 | 64.3 |
March 2009 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 15713 | 65.9 |
March 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 16910 | 65.1 |
March 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 16467 | 41.0 |
March 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 16240 | 41.0 |
March 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 16268 | 41.0 |
February 1998 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 15964 | 55.3 |
April 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 7182 | 62.0 |
May 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 6973 | 62.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 1,142 | 1,142 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 14,152 | 14,152 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 112 | 112 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 90 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 98 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 586 | 586 | 0 | 0 | 0 |