T326, KRAYN ROAD over Norfolk Southern RR

Map

Coordinates:
+40.28980, -78.77360
40°17'23" N, 78°46'25" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	T326, KRAYN ROAD over Norfolk Southern RR
Structure number:	000000000008721
Old structure number:	117201032660010 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	1.MI.SW.OF SALIX
Purpose:	Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	67.9 ft. `[20.7 m]`
Total length:	69.9 ft. `[21.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	31.5 ft. `[9.6 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	19.7 ft. `[6.0 m]`
Skew angle:	7°
Owner:	Town or Township Highway Agency `[03]`
Year built:	1993
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 22.5 / HS 25 `[9]`
Main span material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main span design:	Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread `[06]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	200 `[as of 2018]`
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge not over waterway. `[N]`
Sufficiency rating:	96.0

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
November 2018	Good	Good	Good	Good	200	96.0
November 2016	Good	Good	Good	Good	200	96.0
November 2014	Good	Good	Good	Good	200	96.0
November 2012	Good	Good	Good	Good	200	96.0
January 2011	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	200	96.0
February 2009	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	200	96.0
February 2007	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	200	96.0
March 2005	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	200	98.0
June 2003	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	200	100.0
September 2001	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	200	100.0
September 1999	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
September 1997	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	200	100.0
December 1995	Good	Very Good	Excellent	Very Good	200	98.0
February 1994	Good	Excellent	Excellent	Excellent	200	98.0
March 1993	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	200	29.1
March 1991	Poor	Poor	Fair	Fair	200	29.1