T-308 over STERLING RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+41.42400, -78.2277041°25'26" N, 78°13'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | T-308 over STERLING RUN |
Structure number: | 000000000008956 |
Old structure number: | 127203030800050 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 3.5 MILES SW OF CAMERON |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Total length: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 11.8 ft. [3.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 12.5 ft. [3.8 m] |
Skew angle: | 50° |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, temporary structure in place to carry legal loads [E] |
Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 2017] |
Deck condition: | Serious [3 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 10.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $692,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Poor | 20 | 10.7 |
April 2015 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Serious | 20 | 9.1 |
April 2013 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Poor | 20 | 9.1 |
March 2012 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Poor | 20 | 9.1 |
July 2011 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Poor | 20 | 9.1 |
July 2009 | Poor | Serious | Fair | Poor | 20 | 9.1 |
July 2007 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | 20 | 12.7 |
August 2006 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 20 | 16.8 |
October 2005 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 20 | 16.8 |
December 2004 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 20 | 16.8 |
December 2003 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 20 | 16.8 |
January 2002 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 20 | 16.8 |
March 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 20 | 27.0 |
May 1998 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 20 | 61.7 |
January 1996 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 20 | 61.8 |
December 1994 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 20 | 61.8 |
December 1993 | Poor | Critical | Fair | Fair | 20 | 56.7 |
August 1991 | Poor | Critical | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 20 | 69.3 |