COVER BRIDGE RD over PRINCESS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.83140, -75.5224040°49'53" N, 75°31'21" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COVER BRIDGE RD over PRINCESS CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000009122 |
Old structure number: | 137207037690170 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | LITTLE GAP COVERED BRIDGE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 74.2 ft. [22.6 m] |
Total length: | 78.1 ft. [23.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 8.9 ft. [2.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1880 |
Year reconstructed: | 1987 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Open Grating [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 750 [as of 1979] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 50.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $95,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 750 | 50.0 |
December 2016 | Fair | Very Good | Fair | Fair | 750 | 50.0 |
December 2014 | Fair | Excellent | Fair | Fair | 750 | 50.0 |
September 2014 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Fair | 750 | 34.6 |
September 2013 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Fair | 750 | 34.7 |
September 2011 | Poor | Serious | Poor | Fair | 750 | 34.7 |
January 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 750 | 48.9 |
November 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 750 | 50.9 |
January 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 750 | 50.9 |
August 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 750 | 50.6 |
August 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 750 | 51.6 |
August 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 750 | 51.6 |
August 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 750 | 52.6 |
August 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 750 | 63.7 |
August 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 750 | 63.7 |
August 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 750 | 63.7 |
September 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 750 | 63.7 |
September 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 750 | 63.7 |
September 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 750 | 63.7 |
October 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 750 | 63.7 |
October 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 750 | 63.7 |