CREASYVILLE over LITTLE FISHING CREEK
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+41.21235, -76.4613741°12'44" N, 76°27'41" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CREASYVILLE over LITTLE FISHING CREEK |
Structure number: | 197211060200970 |
Location: | 1.5 MI N OF DERK |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Total length: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1881 |
Year reconstructed: | 1996 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2009
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 50 [as of 2009] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 20.2 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2009 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 20.2 |
July 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 20.2 |
September 1991 | Poor | Good | Poor | Fair | 50 | 17.8 |