SR 62,ELM STREET over OVER TUBBS RUN
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+41.50905, -79.4495941°30'33" N, 79°26'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 62,ELM STREET over OVER TUBBS RUN |
Structure number: | 000000000017195 |
Old structure number: | 270062013021940 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | TIONESTA BOROUGH |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Year reconstructed: | 1973 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,801 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 62.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2016 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 1801 | 62.9 |
April 2014 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 1821 | 64.8 |
April 2012 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 1793 | 64.8 |
April 2010 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 2044 | 63.4 |
April 2008 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 2044 | 63.4 |
April 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2343 | 74.6 |
April 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 2308 | 74.4 |
April 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 2390 | 72.3 |
May 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 2637 | 71.9 |
May 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 2580 | 72.0 |
June 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2537 | 72.1 |
June 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2941 | 61.7 |
June 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2900 | 61.7 |
June 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 2837 | 60.9 |