Share:

PA 75; SR 0075 over WELSH RUN

Franklin County, Pennsylvania

Map

Coordinates:
+39.73610, -77.88733
39°44'10" N, 77°53'14" W

View more info at Bridgehunter.com

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	PA 75; SR 0075 over WELSH RUN
Structure number:	000000000017334
Old structure number:	280075003000000 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	1 MI S KASIESVILLE
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	22.0 ft. `[6.7 m]`
Total length:	24.9 ft. `[7.6 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	30.5 ft. `[9.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	33.5 ft. `[10.2 m]`
Skew angle:	45°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1955
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main span design:	Tee beam `[04]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: December 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	1,914 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	8% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	94.4
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$48,000

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
December 2017	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1914	94.4
December 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1917	94.3
December 2013	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2023	90.2
December 2011	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1966	91.3
January 2010	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2382	89.8
January 2008	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2332	89.9
February 2006	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	2233	90.0
March 2004	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1956	91.3
March 2002	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	1914	91.4
February 2000	Good	Good	Good	Good	1579	91.7
January 1998	Good	Good	Good	Good	1507	91.8
December 1995	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	1702	91.1
October 1993	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	1629	91.2
December 1991	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	1565	91.3

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	109	99	10	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	838	830	8	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	760	760	0	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	141	131	10	0	0
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Rail	linear ft.	50	50	0	0	0

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1464688