SR 1015 over Norfolk Southern Railway
Map
Coordinates:
+39.97100, -80.0465039°58'16" N, 80°02'47" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 1015 over Norfolk Southern Railway |
Structure number: | 000000000018223 |
Old structure number: | 301015004016990 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | Railroad [27] |
Year built: | 1919 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 994 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 64.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $82,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 994 | 64.0 |
September 2016 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 987 | 64.0 |
September 2014 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 972 | 64.1 |
September 2012 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 999 | 64.0 |
September 2010 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1005 | 73.2 |
September 2008 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1005 | 73.2 |
September 2006 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1086 | 73.1 |
September 2004 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1073 | 74.1 |
September 2002 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1012 | 77.2 |
September 2000 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1002 | 77.2 |
September 1998 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1002 | 77.2 |
September 1996 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1098 | 75.1 |
September 1994 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1076 | 75.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 30 | 4 | 20 | 6 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 62 | 14 | 43 | 5 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 69 | 39 | 30 | 0 | 0 |