SR 2001 over RUDOLPH RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+39.76561, -80.1843039°45'56" N, 80°11'03" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 2001 over RUDOLPH RUN |
Structure number: | 000000000018244 |
Old structure number: | 302001007013620 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | PERRY TOWNSHIP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Total length: | 44.9 ft. [13.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 17.4 ft. [5.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 40° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 14 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 60.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $37,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 14 | 60.0 |
September 2016 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 15 | 60.0 |
September 2014 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 58 | 59.9 |
September 2012 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 59 | 59.9 |
September 2010 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 59 | 75.9 |
September 2008 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 59 | 75.9 |
September 2006 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 48 | 76.0 |
September 2004 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 46 | 71.0 |
September 2002 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 46 | 82.0 |
September 2000 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | 30 | 82.0 |
September 1998 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | 935 | 77.1 |
September 1996 | Fair | - | Good | Satisfactory | 885 | 77.1 |
September 1994 | Good | - | Good | Good | 868 | 77.8 |
September 1992 | Good | - | Good | Good | 856 | 77.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 45 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 90 | 75 | 10 | 5 | 0 |