SR 3001 over ENLOW FORK WHEELING CK.

Map

Coordinates:
+39.96199, -80.51673
39°57'43" N, 80°31'00" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SR 3001 over ENLOW FORK WHEELING CK.
Structure number:	000000000018346
Old structure number:	303001051017710 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	RICHHILL TOWNSHIP
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	102.0 ft. `[31.1 m]`
Total length:	104.0 ft. `[31.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	14.8 ft. `[4.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	14.8 ft. `[4.5 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	11.2 ft. `[3.4 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1901
Year reconstructed:	2016
Historic significance:	Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[2]`
Design load:	M 9 / H 10 `[1]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Wood or Timber `[7]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	432 `[as of 2018]`
Truck traffic:	9% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Superior to present desirable criteria `[9]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. `[4]`
Sufficiency rating:	13.3
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$522,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
October 2018	Poor	Good	Poor	Poor	432	13.3
October 2016	Poor	Serious	-	Poor	429	25.0
October 2014	Poor	Poor	Poor	Poor	423	2.5
October 2012	Poor	Poor	Serious	Poor	424	2.5
October 2010	Poor	Fair	Serious	Poor	176	15.9
October 2009	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	196	17.2
January 2009	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	196	17.2
October 2006	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	192	17.3
October 2004	Poor	Good	Serious	Fair	83	19.1
October 2002	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	80	19.2
October 2000	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	80	19.2
October 1998	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	149	18.0
October 1996	Poor	Poor	Serious	Fair	129	12.8

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Stringer	linear ft.	612	612	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	10,753	10,753	0	0	0
Steel Truss	linear ft.	204	204	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	10,753	10,753	0	0	0
Steel Floor Beam	linear ft.	80	80	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	10,753	10,753	0	0	0
Substructure
Masonry Abutment	linear ft.	116	116	0	0	0
Deck
Timber Deck	sq. ft.	1,534	1,534	0	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	1,534	1,534	0	0	0
Bearings
Movable Bearing	each	2	2	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	10,753	10,753	0	0	0
Fixed Bearing	each	2	2	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	10,753	10,753	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	208	208	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	10,753	10,753	0	0	0