SR 3020 over LICK RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+40.35386, -77.6486940°21'14" N, 77°38'55" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 3020 over LICK RUN |
Structure number: | 000000000020274 |
Old structure number: | 343020001004770 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1MI NW PERULACK |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1996 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 46 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 46 | 96.9 |
September 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 46 | 96.9 |
September 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 46 | 99.0 |
September 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 74 | 99.0 |
September 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 74 | 99.0 |
September 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 82 | 99.0 |
March 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 80 | 99.0 |
March 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 78 | 99.0 |
April 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 77 | 99.0 |
April 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 151 | 97.9 |
April 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 148 | 97.9 |
December 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 139 | 97.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |