Share:

SR 8025 over ROAR BR;RR;8025;SERV RD.

Map

Coordinates:
+41.40470, -75.66017
41°24'17" N, 75°39'37" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR 8025 over ROAR BR;RR;8025;SERV RD.
Structure number:000000000020968
Old structure number:358025050000250 (from 1992 edition)
Location:SCRANTON SPRUCE ST COMPLX
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12]
Length of largest span:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Total length:253.9 ft. [77.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1969
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,698 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:36.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$643,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2016PoorFairFairPoor369836.2
July 2014PoorFairFairPoor375841.9
July 2012PoorFairFairPoor380141.7
July 2010PoorFairPoorPoor4749.4
July 2008FairSatisfactoryFairFair4763.4
June 2006FairSatisfactoryFairFair4763.4
June 2004FairSatisfactoryFairFair4570.2
August 2002FairSatisfactoryFairFair4468.2
August 2000FairSatisfactoryFairFair4244.0
October 1998FairSatisfactoryFairFair4044.0
February 1997FairGoodSatisfactoryFair3880.2
April 1995FairGoodSatisfactoryFair3779.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.1,4891,4180710
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.10,2839,66661700
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.7,9227,44747500
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach96300
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.8078110
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.133133000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.148570910
Joints
Strip Seal Jointlinear ft.153140805
Other Jointlinear ft.108200106
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach4848000
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Raillinear ft.5114436800