Share:

SR1013 CiderMillRd over CONESTOGA RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+40.14045, -76.15193
40°08'26" N, 76°09'07" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR1013 CiderMillRd over CONESTOGA RIVER
Structure number:000000000021396
Old structure number:361013025007460 (from 1992 edition)
Location:1MI NOF FAIRMONT
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:86.9 ft. [26.5 m]
Total length:89.9 ft. [27.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:12.8 ft. [3.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:13.1 ft. [4.0 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1846
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:672 [as of 2018]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:62.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$524,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2018FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory67262.5
March 2017FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory61462.5
May 2016FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory60962.5
May 2014FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15562.9
May 2012FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15162.9
May 2011FairGoodGoodSatisfactory25673.8
May 2010FairGoodGoodSatisfactory24673.8
June 2009FairGoodFairSatisfactory24659.8
July 2007FairGoodFairGood27059.8
December 2006FairGoodFairGood26464.8
November 2004GoodGoodGoodGood26175.8
December 2002GoodGoodGoodGood25175.8
November 2000GoodGoodGoodGood14977.9
August 1998GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good14577.9
November 1997GoodExcellentExcellentVery Good15477.9
September 1996FairFairFairFair25415.8
November 1995FairFairFairFair24816.0
October 1994PoorSatisfactoryFairSerious24214.9
October 1993FairSatisfactoryFairFair23617.7
October 1992FairSatisfactoryFairFair23617.7
November 1990PoorGoodSatisfactoryPoor23015.1

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beamlinear ft.435435000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.10,75310,753000
Timber Trusslinear ft.171017100
Substructure
Masonry Abutmentlinear ft.188188000
Deck
Timber Decksq. ft.1,04701,04700
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach1010000