SR 4024 (LR 39056) over ONTELAUNEE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.68683, -75.7617940°41'13" N, 75°45'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 4024 (LR 39056) over ONTELAUNEE CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000023392 |
Old structure number: | 394024001011200 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | MOSSERVILLE ROAD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Total length: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1933 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 603 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 9% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 53.5 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $51,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 603 | 53.5 |
April 2015 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 587 | 55.5 |
April 2013 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 581 | 55.5 |
April 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 798 | 51.2 |
April 2009 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 788 | 51.2 |
April 2007 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 771 | 51.3 |
July 2006 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 746 | 55.8 |
April 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 729 | 55.7 |
April 2003 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 711 | 55.7 |
May 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1056 | 65.1 |
June 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1023 | 65.1 |
June 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 975 | 67.1 |
July 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 929 | 79.7 |
August 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 884 | 79.7 |
November 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 848 | 79.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 258 | 0 | 227 | 31 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,118 | 928 | 190 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,011 | 1,011 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 113 | 65 | 37 | 0 | 11 |
Bearings |
Enclosed/Concealed Bearing | each | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 86 | 0 | 86 | 0 | 0 |