SR 0309 TR 309 over BIG BLACK CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+40.97732, -75.97916
40°58'38" N, 75°58'45" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SR 0309 TR 309 over BIG BLACK CREEK
Structure number:	000000000023847
Old structure number:	400309015000000 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	HAZLE TWP .1 M N TR 940
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	25.9 ft. `[7.9 m]`
Total length:	26.9 ft. `[8.2 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	56.4 ft. `[17.2 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	64.6 ft. `[19.7 m]`
Skew angle:	20°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1928
Year reconstructed:	1991
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Main span material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main span design:	Tee beam `[04]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	13,540 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	58.7
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$218,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
January 2017	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	13540	58.7
January 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	12938	61.1
January 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	12938	61.1
January 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	8146	64.4
January 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	8114	64.4
January 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	20419	55.9
February 2005	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	20177	55.7
February 2003	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	23108	54.9
February 2001	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	22456	50.2
April 1999	Good	Good	Good	Good	22456	53.2
June 1997	Good	Good	Good	Good	16147	52.9
November 1995	Good	Good	Good	Good	18560	62.3
February 1994	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	18342	63.7
March 1992	Good	Very Good	Very Good	Very Good	18342	64.7
May 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	17540	65.5

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	338	299	30	9	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	1,747	1,660	87	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	1,523	1,447	76	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	204	184	20	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	27	27	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	10,753	10,753	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	27	27	0	0	0