T-762 (CTY BR 101) over PINE CREEK


+41.52160, -77.44810
41°31'18" N, 77°26'53" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:T-762 (CTY BR 101) over PINE CREEK
Structure number:000000000025059
Old structure number:417205076201010 (from 1992 edition)
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:116.1 ft. [35.4 m]
Total length:304.1 ft. [92.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.4 ft. [5.9 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1977
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:79.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$335,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2017FairSatisfactoryGoodGood20079.0
September 2015GoodGoodGoodGood20079.0
September 2013GoodGoodGoodGood20079.0
September 2011GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
September 2009GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
September 2008GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
May 2007GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
May 2005GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
May 2003GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
May 2001GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
June 1999GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
July 1997GoodGoodGoodGood20084.0
August 1995GoodVery GoodGoodGood20087.0
September 1993GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood20086.0
September 1991GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood20086.0