Share:

SR 58,HARRISVILLE over OVER SWAMP RUN BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+41.14343, -80.05826
41°08'36" N, 80°03'30" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR 58,HARRISVILLE over OVER SWAMP RUN BRANCH
Structure number:000000000025681
Old structure number:430058080008640 (from 1992 edition)
Location:PINE TOWNSHIP
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Total length:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,973 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:43.9 tons [39.9 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:85.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$144,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
March 201685.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-3973
March 201485.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-4019
March 201285.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-4205
March 201084.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-4250
March 200867.2PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD4250
March 200666.7PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD5387
March 200467.8PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD5260
March 200268.9PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD5026
March 200069.1PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD4356
March 199869.2PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoorSD4187
March 199685.5FairSatisfactoryFairFair-4105
April 199485.5FairSatisfactoryFairFair-4329
April 199269.1PoorGoodFairPoorSD4252
March 199085.5FairGoodSatisfactoryFair-4161

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2016 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1. Good2. Fair3. Poor4. Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.344339050
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.1,6651,6481700
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.1,5081,508000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.120900030
Bearings
Movable Bearingeach88000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.10,75310,753000
Fixed Bearingeach88000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.10,75310,753000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.904520025
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.10,75310,753000