Share:

SR 58,HARRISVILLE over OVER SWAMP RUN BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+41.14342, -80.05810
41°08'36" N, 80°03'29" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR 58,HARRISVILLE over OVER SWAMP RUN BRANCH
Structure number:000000000025681
Old structure number:430058080008640 (from 1992 edition)
Location:PINE TOWNSHIP
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Total length:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.5 ft. [10.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:37.1 ft. [11.3 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,973 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:85.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$144,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair397385.7
March 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair401985.7
March 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair420585.6
March 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair425084.6
March 2008PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor425067.2
March 2006PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor538766.7
March 2004PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor526067.8
March 2002PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor502668.9
March 2000PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor435669.1
March 1998PoorSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor418769.2
March 1996FairSatisfactoryFairFair410585.5
April 1994FairSatisfactoryFairFair432985.5
April 1992PoorGoodFairPoor425269.1
March 1990FairGoodSatisfactoryFair416185.5

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.3443171980
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.1,6651,6521300
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.1,5081,508000
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.120903000
Bearings
Movable Bearingeach88000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.10,75310,753000
Fixed Bearingeach88000
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.10,75310,753000
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Raillinear ft.904520025
Steel Protective Coatingsq. ft.10,75310,753000