BRIDGE 2631,T-724 over OVER PINE RUN
Map
Coordinates:
+41.19160, -80.1875041°11'30" N, 80°11'15" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BRIDGE 2631,T-724 over OVER PINE RUN |
Structure number: | 000000000026114 |
Old structure number: | 437206072426310 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | CRIBBS ROAD, FINDLEY TWP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 23 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 23 | 100.0 |
September 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 63 | 100.0 |
September 2013 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 56 | 100.0 |
September 2011 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 29 | 100.0 |
September 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 120 | 94.5 |
September 2007 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 66 | 100.0 |
September 2005 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 37 | 100.0 |
October 2003 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 32 | 100.0 |
October 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 36 | 100.0 |
September 1999 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 47 | 100.0 |
June 1997 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 36 | 100.0 |
May 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 36 | 100.0 |
April 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 25 | 19.9 |
April 1993 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 25 | 19.9 |
April 1992 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 29 | 21.9 |
April 1991 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 29 | 21.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 175 | 175 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 653 | 653 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 653 | 653 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 68 | 68 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 14 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 53 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 |