SR 2022 over BRUSH CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+39.88078, -78.8546239°52'51" N, 78°51'17" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 2022 over BRUSH CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000031645 |
Old structure number: | 552022009030000 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 1 MI.NW.OF JOHNSONBURG |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.5 ft. [4.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1910 |
Year reconstructed: | 2009 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 18% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 54.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $638,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 25 | 54.0 |
June 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 25 | 54.0 |
June 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 26 | 54.0 |
July 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 35 | 70.0 |
July 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 35 | 69.0 |
August 2007 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 21 | 48.0 |
August 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 21 | 48.0 |
July 2005 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 21 | 42.2 |
July 2004 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 21 | 48.0 |
July 2003 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 21 | 42.2 |
October 2002 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 21 | 42.2 |
August 2001 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 100 | 42.0 |
July 2000 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 100 | 42.0 |
July 1999 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 98 | 42.0 |
August 1998 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 96 | 42.0 |
July 1997 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 96 | 42.0 |
June 1996 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Poor | 43 | 42.1 |
July 1995 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 42 | 42.1 |
July 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 41 | 42.1 |
July 1993 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 41 | 42.1 |
August 1992 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 41 | 42.1 |
August 1991 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 40 | 42.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 14 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 64 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 0 |