PUMP STATION RD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.53790, -79.8017041°32'16" N, 79°48'06" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PUMP STATION RD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000033913 |
Old structure number: | 607214059530280 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | PLUM TOWNSHIP |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
Total length: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Other [9] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
March 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
March 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
March 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
March 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 100.0 |
April 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
October 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
November 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
September 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
September 1995 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | 100 | 99.0 |
October 1993 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 100 | 99.0 |
September 1991 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Good | 100 | 22.6 |