BAILEY BRIDGE T686 over TENMILE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.02060, -80.1956040°01'14" N, 80°11'44" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BAILEY BRIDGE T686 over TENMILE CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000035242 |
Old structure number: | 627201068640480 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | 600' SOUTH OF SR 2020 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 70.9 ft. [21.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 9.2 ft. [2.8 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1887 |
Year reconstructed: | 2001 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 10 [as of 2017] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 54.2 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $91,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 54.2 |
August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 54.2 |
August 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 55.0 |
August 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 20.0 |
August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 10 | 20.0 |
June 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 27.1 |
August 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 27.1 |
August 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 65.9 |
September 2003 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 64.9 |
September 2001 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 10 | 66.2 |
December 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 10 | 67.2 |
September 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 10 | 27.0 |
November 1995 | Poor | Satisfactory | Serious | Good | 10 | 20.4 |
October 1993 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 10 | 28.8 |
October 1991 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Very Good | 10 | 28.8 |