SR 0006 TR 6 TR191 over LACKAWAXEN RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+41.57671, -75.25788
41°34'36" N, 75°15'28" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SR 0006 TR 6 TR191 over LACKAWAXEN RIVER
Structure number:	000000000035424
Old structure number:	630006026004450 `(from 1992 edition)`
Location:	HONESDALE BORO JCT TR 191
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Minor Arterial (Urban) `[16]`
Length of largest span:	62.0 ft. `[18.9 m]`
Total length:	128.0 ft. `[39.0 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	47.9 ft. `[14.6 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	69.9 ft. `[21.3 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1944
Year reconstructed:	1980
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main spans design:	Box beam or girders - Multiple `[05]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	10,468 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	4% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Very Good `[8 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. `[4]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. `[4]`
Sufficiency rating:	95.5
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$178,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
April 2017	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	10468	95.5
April 2015	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	10543	95.5
April 2013	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	10276	95.5
April 2011	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	9873	95.6
April 2009	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	10706	95.5
April 2007	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	13072	95.1
April 2005	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	12040	95.3
April 2003	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	11804	95.3
May 2001	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	12871	95.2
June 1999	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	12408	95.2
January 1998	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	13584	93.6
March 1996	Fair	Good	Very Good	Satisfactory	11111	93.3
April 1994	Fair	Good	Good	Satisfactory	11111	93.3

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder	linear ft.	1,612	1,612	0	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	6,554	6,554	0	0	0
Substructure
Masonry Pier Wall	linear ft.	76	74	2	0	0
Masonry Abutment	linear ft.	180	180	0	0	0
Joints
Pourable Joint	linear ft.	106	106	0	0	0
Compression Joint	linear ft.	53	47	6	0	0
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearing	each	52	52	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	250	250	0	0	0