SR 0191 TR 191 over LITTLE EQUINUNK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.75238, -75.1861541°45'09" N, 75°11'10" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 0191 TR 191 over LITTLE EQUINUNK CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000035473 |
Old structure number: | 630191084000000 (from 1992 edition) |
Location: | DAMASCUS TP 1.2M N SR1025 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Total length: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 45° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,678 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 49.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $319,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 1678 | 49.5 |
May 2015 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 1872 | 49.2 |
May 2013 | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Poor | 1864 | 49.2 |
May 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 1705 | 59.2 |
May 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1674 | 59.3 |
May 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1619 | 59.3 |
May 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1640 | 57.7 |
May 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1637 | 58.7 |
June 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1597 | 55.7 |
July 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1297 | 56.2 |
December 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1407 | 56.0 |
March 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1371 | 56.1 |
April 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1513 | 61.8 |
June 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1486 | 61.9 |
October 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 1437 | 62.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 192 | 107 | 79 | 6 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 884 | 831 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 782 | 743 | 39 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 125 | 116 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,753 | 10,753 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 10,753 | 10,753 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 68 | 60 | 8 | 0 | 0 |