Diamond Street over AMTRAK(NE CORRI);CONRAIL


+39.98740, -75.17720
39°59'15" N, 75°10'38" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Diamond Street over AMTRAK(NE CORRI);CONRAIL
Structure number:000000000039134
Old structure number:677301003000970 (from 1992 edition)
Location:E. of 22nd Street 28D06
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:92.9 ft. [28.3 m]
Total length:158.1 ft. [48.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Skew angle:47°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1918
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,200 [as of 1985]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Sufficiency rating:92.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$5,006,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
November 2016GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.5
November 2014GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.5
November 2012GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.5
November 2010GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.5
November 2008GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.5
January 2007GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.5
November 2006GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.5
November 2004GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920092.1
November 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920096.1
November 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920096.1
November 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good920095.1
November 1996GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent920094.1
November 1994PoorSeriousPoorSerious920045.0
November 1992PoorSeriousPoorSerious920045.0
November 1990PoorPoorPoorSerious920046.1