Share:

70th Street over AMTRAK (NE Corridor)

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.91903, -75.23953
39°55'09" N, 75°14'22" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:70th Street over AMTRAK (NE Corridor)
Structure number:000000000039174
Old structure number:677301007002290 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S.PASCHALL AVE 36E05
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Total length:101.1 ft. [30.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:63.7 ft. [19.4 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1949
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10,200 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:27.9 tons [25.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:16.9 tons [15.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:52.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201552.2FairFairFairSatisfactoryFO10200
February 201462.4FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10200
December 201264.4FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactoryFO10200
February 201271.6FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 201070.2FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 200870.2FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 200654.1FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 200454.1FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 200255.2FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 200055.2FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 199855.2FairFairSatisfactoryGoodFO10200
February 199675.9FairFairSatisfactoryGood-10200
February 199478.8FairFairSatisfactoryGood-10200
February 199275.8GoodGoodGoodGood-10200
February 199075.8GoodGoodGoodGood-10200