Linden Avenue over AMTRAK (NE CORRIDOR)


+40.04726, -74.99632
40°02'50" N, 74°59'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:Linden Avenue over AMTRAK (NE CORRIDOR)
Structure number:000000000039228
Old structure number:677301015003200 (from 1992 edition)
Location:W of State Rd 20A08
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:118.1 ft. [36.0 m]
Total length:123.0 ft. [37.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:53.5 ft. [16.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,500 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:101.8 tons [92.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:60.8 tons [55.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:92.3
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$2,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
February 201592.3FairGoodSatisfactoryGoodFO13500
August 201492.3GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO13500
January 201367.0PoorVery GoodPoorGoodSD13500
August 201089.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO12300
August 200891.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO12300
August 200691.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodFO12300
August 200476.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-12300
August 200276.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-12300
October 200076.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-12300
August 199876.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-12300
August 199695.5GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-12300
August 199449.2PoorSeriousFairPoorSD9500
August 199249.2PoorSeriousFairPoorSD9500
August 199049.2PoorSeriousFairPoorSD9500