PR 3 over SECA CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+18.23833, -65.6600018°14'18" N, 65°39'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PR 3 over SECA CREEK |
Structure number: | 001191 |
Location: | 3 KM SOUTH WEST OF CEIBA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Total length: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,900 [as of 2005] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 74.1 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $217,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3900 | 74.1 |
August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3900 | 74.1 |
August 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3900 | 74.1 |
September 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3900 | 74.1 |
September 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3600 | 74.2 |
February 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3600 | 74.2 |
February 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3600 | 50.0 |
February 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3600 | 50.0 |
August 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3700 | 49.9 |
July 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3500 | 50.0 |
July 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 12800 | 43.8 |
June 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 9600 | 43.9 |
April 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 7300 | 47.0 |
July 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 17000 | 48.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 187 | 187 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,044 | 872 | 172 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 861 | 624 | 237 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 678 | 678 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 861 | 839 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 861 | 861 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 102 | 82 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 72 | 65 | 7 | 0 | 0 |