PR-3 over DAGUAO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+18.22667, -65.6766718°13'36" N, 65°40'36" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PR-3 over DAGUAO RIVER |
Structure number: | 001201 |
Location: | 5 KM SOUTH WEST OF CEIBA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 32.8 ft. [10.0 m] |
Total length: | 97.1 ft. [29.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 17.1 ft. [5.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1923 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 5,100 [as of 2005] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 64.3 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $436,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5100 | 64.3 |
August 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5100 | 64.3 |
August 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5100 | 64.3 |
September 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5100 | 64.3 |
September 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4800 | 64.9 |
February 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 4800 | 64.9 |
February 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 5000 | 39.1 |
February 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 4800 | 26.8 |
July 2001 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3500 | 28.2 |
July 1999 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 3500 | 28.2 |
July 1997 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 12900 | 29.8 |
June 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 10700 | 15.8 |
April 1993 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 9500 | 49.1 |
August 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 9100 | 47.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 486 | 338 | 118 | 30 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,777 | 1,927 | 678 | 172 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,938 | 1,077 | 861 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,647 | 1,582 | 65 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,938 | 1,292 | 646 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,647 | 1,216 | 431 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 43 | 20 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 95 | 75 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 194 | 115 | 66 | 13 | 0 |