PR 976 over JUAN DIEGO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+18.27634, -65.7074418°16'35" N, 65°42'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PR 976 over JUAN DIEGO CREEK |
Structure number: | 006841 |
Location: | 4 MILES WEST OF CEIBA |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 10.8 ft. [3.3 m] |
Total length: | 32.5 ft. [9.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 29° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1954 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,907 [as of 2009] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4] |
Sufficiency rating: | 48.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $116,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2907 | 48.3 |
July 2016 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 2907 | 37.4 |
June 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 2907 | 37.1 |
June 2012 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 700 | 19.2 |
July 2010 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 700 | 67.7 |
August 2008 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 700 | 67.7 |
September 2006 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 700 | 47.2 |
April 2003 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 700 | 47.2 |
May 2000 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1000 | 54.1 |
April 1998 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1000 | 54.1 |
June 1996 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1800 | 53.8 |
August 1994 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1700 | 53.8 |
August 1992 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1700 | 53.8 |
February 1991 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2100 | 53.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 79 | 46 | 33 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 66 | 47 | 3 | 16 | 0 |