Share:

PR 2 over DE ORO CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+18.21167, -67.15167
18°12'42" N, 67°09'06" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PR 2 over DE ORO CREEK
Structure number:007841
Location:AT MAYAGUEZ NORTH END
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:59.4 ft. [18.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:82.7 ft. [25.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:159.8 ft. [48.7 m]
Skew angle:48°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:56,700 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:26.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$264,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2017Fair5 out of 105670026.0
February 2015Fair5 out of 105670026.0
February 2013Fair5 out of 105670026.0
February 2011Fair5 out of 105670082.0
February 2009Fair5 out of 105670082.0
May 2007Fair5 out of 105150081.5
May 2005Fair5 out of 105620068.9
June 2002Fair5 out of 106640067.6
May 2000Fair5 out of 106780067.4
July 1998Fair6 out of 106630078.7
May 1996Fair6 out of 104570078.9
March 1994Fair6 out of 103650080.7
May 1990Fair6 out of 102930081.3

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.17410226460
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.112109030