PR 971 over FAJARDO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+18.26833, -65.7200018°16'06" N, 65°43'12" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PR 971 over FAJARDO RIVER |
Structure number: | 008131 |
Location: | 10 KM WEST OF CEIBA |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Total length: | 112.5 ft. [34.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 17.4 ft. [5.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1961 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 866 [as of 2006] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; field review indicates that extensive scour has occurred at bridge foundations. [2] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.3 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $702,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 866 | 76.3 |
April 2015 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 866 | 76.3 |
April 2013 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 76.2 |
April 2011 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 76.2 |
May 2009 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 76.2 |
October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 76.2 |
November 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1000 | 54.7 |
April 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 1000 | 54.7 |
May 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1000 | 65.9 |
April 1998 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1000 | 54.7 |
June 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 1000 | 54.7 |
August 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 2100 | 53.4 |
August 1992 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 2100 | 53.4 |
February 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 2100 | 61.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 338 | 318 | 13 | 7 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 2,540 | 495 | 1,776 | 269 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 128 | 118 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 49 | 39 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 36 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 226 | 216 | 10 | 0 | 0 |