LOCAL ROAD over SAN ANTONIO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+18.18915, -67.0001418°11'21" N, 67°00'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LOCAL ROAD over SAN ANTONIO RIVER |
Structure number: | 015301 |
Location: | 5 KM WEST OF MARICAO |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
Total length: | 62.0 ft. [18.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1960 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
Average daily traffic: | 400 [as of 2005] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 53.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $32,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 53.1 |
September 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 53.1 |
September 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 53.1 |
August 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 50.1 |
August 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 53.1 |
June 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 54.6 |
August 2006 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 40.0 |
December 2004 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 40.0 |
June 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 41.3 |
March 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 42.5 |
April 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 40.0 |
May 1996 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 400 | 40.0 |
November 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 400 | 44.5 |
December 1992 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 360 | 45.0 |
February 1991 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 360 | 39.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 312 | 233 | 79 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 366 | 205 | 118 | 0 | 43 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,389 | 0 | 1,389 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 30 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 223 | 213 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 46 | 0 | 33 | 13 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Other Material Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 125 | 125 | 0 | 0 | 0 |