Share:

PR 971 over CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+18.26622, -65.72126
18°15'58" N, 65°43'17" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PR 971 over CREEK
Structure number:015731
Location:8.5 KM WEST OF CEIBA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:10.2 ft. [3.1 m]
Total length:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Skew angle:34°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B]
Average daily traffic:866 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:4% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Sufficiency rating:21.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$33,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
October 2018Poor4 out of 1086621.6
June 2017Poor4 out of 1086615.2
May 2016Poor4 out of 10100014.2
April 2015Poor4 out of 10100014.2
April 2014Poor4 out of 10100014.2
May 2013Poor4 out of 10100051.2
May 2011Poor4 out of 10100052.1
May 2009Fair5 out of 10100066.5
October 2007Fair5 out of 10100066.5
November 2005Fair5 out of 10100045.7
May 2003Fair5 out of 10100045.7
May 2000Fair5 out of 10100045.7
December 1998Fair5 out of 10110049.7
June 1996Fair5 out of 10100049.8
August 1994Fair5 out of 10100047.1
August 1992Fair5 out of 1092047.2
February 1991Fair5 out of 1092047.2

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.52260260
Bridge Rail
Other Material Bridge Raillinear ft.49103900