Share:

PR 975 over CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+18.26667, -65.72333
18°16'00" N, 65°43'24" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PR 975 over CREEK
Structure number:017031
Location:9 KM WEST OF CEIBA
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Total length:31.5 ft. [9.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Skew angle:36°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1980
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:300 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:89.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$204,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
December 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30089.8
September 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
September 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
September 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
October 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
February 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
February 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
February 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
September 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
October 1999FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30090.8
October 1997GoodGoodGoodGood30090.8
February 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory30086.6
November 1993FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood30090.6
February 1992GoodGoodGoodGood27090.6

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.1211012000
Joints
Compression Jointlinear ft.6906900
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearingeach20020
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.66531300
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Slabsq. ft.93668824800