Share:

ROAD IN CAAM CAMPU over WATERWAY

Map

Coordinates:
+18.21500, -67.14333
18°12'54" N, 67°08'36" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ROAD IN CAAM CAMPU over WATERWAY
Structure number:021601
Location:IN CAAM CAMPUS
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.8 ft. [10.6 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,000 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:61.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$32,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
December 2018FairFairFairSatisfactory300061.5
December 2016FairFairFairSatisfactory300061.5
December 2014FairFairFairSatisfactory300061.5
November 2012FairFairFairSatisfactory300059.1
November 2010FairFairFairSatisfactory300066.6
November 2008FairFairFairSatisfactory300066.6
March 2007FairFairFairSatisfactory300065.6
May 2005FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory300066.6
June 2002FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory300066.6
May 2000FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory300066.6
July 1998FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory300077.6
May 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory300077.6
June 1994FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory300077.7
August 1992FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory300077.7
December 1990FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory300077.7

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.1971841300
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Decksq. ft.1,1411,00114000
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.743074300
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutmentlinear ft.3932700
Joints
Compression Jointlinear ft.7907900
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.6659700