PR 250 over ENSENADA CHANNEL
Map
Coordinates:
+18.30220, -65.2998918°18'08" N, 65°17'60" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PR 250 over ENSENADA CHANNEL |
Structure number: | 022001 |
Location: | SECTOR FULLADOSA, CULEBRA |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 6.6 ft. [2.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1979 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Movable - Lift [15] |
Deck type: | Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5] |
Wearing surface: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 4,800 [as of 2004] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Pier/abutment protection: | In place and functioning [2] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 41.7 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $534,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2018 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 4800 | 41.7 |
March 2017 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 4800 | 36.9 |
March 2016 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 4800 | 36.9 |
March 2015 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 4800 | 37.5 |
February 2014 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 4800 | 37.5 |
February 2012 | Poor | Good | Poor | Good | 4300 | 47.4 |
April 2010 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Good | 4300 | 44.0 |
March 2007 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | 4500 | 52.3 |
February 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 4300 | 66.2 |
March 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 4300 | 66.2 |
March 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 3400 | 69.9 |
November 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 200 | 71.9 |
December 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 200 | 71.9 |
December 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 200 | 60.9 |
January 1991 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 200 | 46.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Truss | linear ft. | 223 | 180 | 43 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 366 | 173 | 0 | 161 | 32 |
Steel Floor Beam | linear ft. | 308 | 269 | 0 | 39 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,012 | 818 | 0 | 183 | 11 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 92 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Corrugated or Orthotropic Deck | sq. ft. | 1,270 | 1,270 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Fixed Bearing | each | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 65 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 52 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 7 |