PR 53 EASTBOUND over SECO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+17.97333, -66.1666717°58'24" N, 66°10'00" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PR 53 EASTBOUND over SECO RIVER |
Structure number: | 022552 |
Location: | 6 KM NORTHWEST OF GUAYAMA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Tolls: | Yes, on toll road [2] |
Length of largest span: | 113.5 ft. [34.6 m] |
Total length: | 721.2 ft. [219.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.7 ft. [12.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Owner: | State Toll Authority [31] |
Year built: | 1994 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,500 [as of 2005] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.6 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $412,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 9500 | 98.6 |
April 2015 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 9500 | 98.6 |
April 2013 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 9500 | 98.6 |
April 2011 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 9500 | 98.6 |
April 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 9850 | 99.5 |
November 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 9850 | 99.5 |
April 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 9000 | 99.6 |
April 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 7950 | 99.6 |
October 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 7950 | 99.6 |
December 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7300 | 99.7 |
September 1997 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 12800 | 98.0 |
May 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6350 | 98.0 |
June 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5100 | 98.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 8,609 | 8,609 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 63,313 | 19,009 | 26,899 | 17,405 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 427 | 427 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 505 | 505 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 656 | 252 | 328 | 10 | 66 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 168 | 168 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 2,874 | 2,874 | 0 | 0 | 0 |