OFF PR 191 over WATERWAY
Map
Coordinates:
+18.24333, -65.7783318°14'36" N, 65°46'42" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | OFF PR 191 over WATERWAY |
Structure number: | 023921 |
Location: | 1.1 KM NORTH OF PR 191 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Total length: | 75.8 ft. [23.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 44° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1975 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 100 [as of 2005] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 60.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $37,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 100 | 60.1 |
June 2017 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 100 | 44.5 |
June 2015 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 100 | 44.5 |
June 2013 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Fair | 100 | 44.5 |
June 2011 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 70.3 |
June 2009 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 70.3 |
November 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 48.5 |
November 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 45.9 |
April 2003 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 45.9 |
August 2000 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 45.9 |
December 1998 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 100 | 45.9 |
June 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 47.1 |
December 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 50 | 47.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 56 | 0 | 46 | 10 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 52 | 0 | 42 | 10 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,335 | 0 | 1,270 | 65 | 0 |