PR 53 over WATERWAY
Map
Coordinates:
+18.24833, -66.0483318°14'54" N, 66°02'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PR 53 over WATERWAY |
Structure number: | 024601 |
Location: | 2 KMS SOUTH OF CEIBA TOWN |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Tolls: | Yes, on toll road [2] |
Length of largest span: | 19.7 ft. [6.0 m] |
Total length: | 43.6 ft. [13.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 119.8 ft. [36.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 193.9 ft. [59.1 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1996 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 23,600 [as of 2005] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2017 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 23600 | 84.5 |
May 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 23600 | 84.5 |
May 2013 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 23600 | 84.5 |
May 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 18492 | 96.3 |
May 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 23600 | 95.8 |
October 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 16700 | 96.4 |
November 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 16700 | 96.4 |
April 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 14600 | 96.6 |
July 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 14600 | 96.6 |
December 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 13000 | 97.4 |
November 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 9200 | 97.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 387 | 360 | 20 | 7 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 131 | 131 | 0 | 0 | 0 |