RI 114/103 CNTY RD over BARRINGTON RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+41.73670, -71.2960041°44'12" N, 71°17'46" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RI 114/103 CNTY RD over BARRINGTON RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000001230 |
Location: | 1.0 Mi W of JCT RI 136 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 64.0 ft. [19.5 m] |
Total length: | 431.1 ft. [131.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 2009 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main spans design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 19,999 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 57.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $7,127,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 19999 | 57.0 |
May 2015 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 19999 | 66.0 |
June 2013 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 26000 | 68.0 |
June 2011 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 26000 | 72.4 |
September 2009 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 26000 | 72.4 |
October 2002 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 20716 | 38.1 |
January 2001 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 20716 | 38.1 |
September 1998 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 20000 | 38.5 |
August 1996 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 19600 | 45.4 |
October 1995 | Poor | - | Poor | Good | 10300 | 46.0 |
July 1994 | Poor | - | Poor | Good | 10300 | 46.0 |
July 1992 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 10300 | 46.0 |
June 1990 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 10300 | 48.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder | linear ft. | 4,686 | 4,485 | 201 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Prestressed Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 17,040 | 17,040 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 12,935 | 12,935 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 288 | 225 | 62 | 1 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 96 | 91 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile Cap/Footing | linear ft. | 288 | 0 | 288 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 60 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compression Joint | linear ft. | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 182 | 179 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,539 | 1,514 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 7,695 | 7,670 | 25 | 0 | 0 |