BRIDGE ST over E BAY BICYCLE FAC
Map
Coordinates:
+41.72110, -71.2827441°43'16" N, 71°16'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | BRIDGE ST over E BAY BICYCLE FAC |
Structure number: | 000000000009420 |
Location: | 0.7 Mi S of JCT RI 103 |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over pedestrian/bicycle trail |
Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Total length: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 18.0 ft. [5.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 6.6 ft. [2.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 62° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,313 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 92.9 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $330,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1313 | 92.9 |
November 2016 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1313 | 92.9 |
November 2014 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1000 | 93.0 |
November 2012 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1000 | 91.1 |
December 2010 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1000 | 92.9 |
January 2009 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1000 | 92.9 |
March 2007 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1000 | 92.9 |
October 2004 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1000 | 92.9 |
December 2002 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1000 | 92.9 |
November 2000 | Good | - | Very Good | Good | 1000 | 92.9 |
November 1998 | Good | - | Very Good | Good | 1000 | 77.9 |
August 1996 | Good | - | Very Good | Very Good | 500 | 77.9 |
July 1994 | Good | - | Very Good | Very Good | 500 | 78.0 |
December 1993 | Good | - | Very Good | Very Good | 500 | 78.0 |
July 1992 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Fair | 500 | 21.0 |
October 1991 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Fair | 500 | 18.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 72 | 71 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,880 | 2,592 | 288 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Other Material Abutment | linear ft. | 144 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Timber Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 160 | 48 | 106 | 6 | 0 |