RI 122 COURT ST over BLACKSTONE RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+42.00250, -71.51176
42°00'09" N, 71°30'42" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	RI 122 COURT ST over BLACKSTONE RIVER
Structure number:	000000000009590
Location:	200 FT NW JCT RI126x104
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	163.1 ft. `[49.7 m]`
Total length:	516.1 ft. `[157.3 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	37.1 ft. `[11.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	52.2 ft. `[15.9 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	29.5 ft. `[9.0 m]`
Skew angle:	27°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1895
Year reconstructed:	2000
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	4
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Good
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	19,379 `[as of 2015]`
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Superior to present desirable criteria `[9]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	71.5
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$7,598,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2018	Good	Good	Good	Good	19379	71.5
August 2016	Good	Good	Good	Good	19379	78.5
August 2014	Good	Good	Good	Good	11200	79.0
August 2012	Good	Good	Good	Good	11200	71.7
August 2010	Good	Good	Good	Good	11200	75.6
August 2008	Good	Good	Good	Good	11200	77.6
July 2006	Good	Good	Good	Good	14398	77.2
August 2004	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	14398	77.2
December 2001	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	14398	77.2
January 2001	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	14398	77.2
December 1997	Poor	Serious	Serious	Satisfactory	18300	23.4
October 1995	Poor	Serious	Serious	Satisfactory	10300	26.1
September 1994	Poor	Serious	Serious	Satisfactory	10300	26.1
December 1993	Poor	Serious	Serious	Satisfactory	10300	26.1
March 1992	Poor	Serious	Serious	Satisfactory	10300	30.0
April 1990	Poor	Poor	Serious	Satisfactory	10300	31.2

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	2,959	2,904	55	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	60,875	60,571	304	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	28,882	28,742	140	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	21,045	19,993	1,052	0	0
Substructure
Masonry Pier Wall	linear ft.	162	152	10	0	0
Masonry Abutment	linear ft.	133	112	21	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	162	160	2	0	0
Joints
Strip Seal Joint	linear ft.	187	0	187	0	0
Pourable Joint	linear ft.	83	55	28	0	0
Bearings
Disk Bearing	each	41	38	3	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	82	78	4	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	1,094	1,094	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	3,282	3,218	64	0	0