Share: 
120th Street over Langford Ditch
Map
Coordinates:
+45.64615, -97.85541
45°38'46" N, 97°51'19" W
+45.64615, -97.85541
45°38'46" N, 97°51'19" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | 120th Street over Langford Ditch |
| Structure number: | 000000046060200 |
| Location: | 1W & 3N of Langford |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2017 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 2015] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | No noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the culvert. Insignificant scrape marks caused by drift. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 100.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 2017 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 25 | 100.0 |
| July 2015 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 36.0 |
| September 2013 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 38.0 |
| September 2011 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 44.5 |
| June 2009 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 44.5 |
| July 2007 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 44.5 |
| August 2005 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 44.5 |
| July 2003 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 42.5 |
| September 2001 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 42.5 |
| August 1999 | Poor | N out of 10 | 25 | 41.5 |
| October 1997 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 53.5 |
| August 1995 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 53.3 |
| July 1993 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 42.0 |
| August 1991 | Fair | N out of 10 | 25 | 43.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1493299
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1493299