Share:

118th Street over Langford Ditch

Map

Coordinates:
+45.67516, -97.85508
45°40'31" N, 97°51'18" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:118th Street over Langford Ditch
Structure number:000000046061180
Location:5N & 1W of Langford
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.0 ft. [5.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1935
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:25 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:38.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$400,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2017PoorSatisfactoryFairPoor2538.0
July 2015FairSatisfactoryFairFair2538.0
September 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2557.1
September 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2564.0
June 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2564.0
July 2007FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2564.0
August 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2564.0
July 2003FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2563.0
September 2001FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2563.0
August 1999FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2562.5
October 1997FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory2563.5
August 1995FairGoodSatisfactoryGood2569.0
July 1993FairGoodSatisfactoryGood2555.3
August 1991FairGoodSatisfactoryGood2555.3