I090 E over I090 EF & BH NAT CEM RD
Map
Coordinates:
+44.37099, -103.4729744°22'16" N, 103°28'23" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | I090 E over I090 EF & BH NAT CEM RD |
Structure number: | 000000047048462 |
Location: | BH NATL CEM INTERCHANGE |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Interstate (Rural) [01] |
Length of largest span: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Total length: | 119.1 ft. [36.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.3 ft. [13.5 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Epoxy Overlay [5] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,278 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 11% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 84.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 9278 | 84.0 |
December 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 9420 | 82.0 |
December 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 8705 | 93.0 |
December 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 8860 | 94.0 |
December 2010 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8600 | 94.0 |
December 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 8660 | 94.0 |
January 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 8600 | 94.0 |
January 2005 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 8955 | 93.0 |
January 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 8275 | 93.0 |
January 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 7400 | 93.0 |
February 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | 7520 | 93.0 |
March 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6210 | 94.0 |
March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5500 | 94.0 |
October 1992 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 5570 | 94.0 |
November 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 5290 | 94.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 124 | 74 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 238 | 69 | 79 | 90 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 5,276 | 4,360 | 916 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 9,520 | 6,833 | 255 | 1,190 | 1,242 |