Share:

BIXBY ROAD over THUNDER BUTTE CK

Map

Coordinates:
+45.51595, -102.56036
45°30'57" N, 102°33'37" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:BIXBY ROAD over THUNDER BUTTE CK
Structure number:000000053190299
Location:4.6 W 0.9 S BISON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:12.1 ft. [3.7 m]
Total length:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:172 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.9
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$3,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
May 2017Fair6 out of 1017299.9
June 2013Fair6 out of 1017274.2
July 2009Fair6 out of 1017292.7
September 2005Good7 out of 1017292.7
August 2003Good7 out of 1017292.7
October 2001Good7 out of 1017292.7
August 1999Good7 out of 1017292.7
August 1997Good7 out of 1017292.7
May 1995Good7 out of 1017292.4
June 1993Good7 out of 1017292.4
May 1991Good7 out of 1017292.4