Share:

NFA D262 over BRANCH

Map

Coordinates:
+35.08182, -85.18695
35°04'55" N, 85°11'13" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:NFA D262 over BRANCH
Structure number:330Z0050001
Location:2 MI S OF TENN RIVER
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:39.0 ft. [11.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:890 [as of 2018]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:97.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
March 2018Good7 out of 1089097.9
March 2016Good7 out of 1089097.9
March 2014Good7 out of 1089097.9
March 2012Good7 out of 1089097.9
March 2010Good7 out of 1089096.9
February 2008Good7 out of 1089096.9
March 2006Good7 out of 1089096.9
April 2004Good7 out of 1089096.9
March 2002Good7 out of 1088096.9
April 2000Good7 out of 1088096.9
March 1998Good7 out of 1088096.9
April 1996Good7 out of 1083095.9
February 1994Good7 out of 1083095.9
March 1992Good7 out of 1083095.9
February 1990Good7 out of 1083095.9