FAP 29 over TN R/SOURR/FAU 5395&3619

Map

Coordinates:
+35.05480, -85.31522
35°03'17" N, 85°18'55" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	FAP 29 over TN R/SOURR/FAU 5395&3619
Structure number:	33FA0271001
Location:	SR-29 / TENN. RIVER
Purpose:	Carries highway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) `[12]`
Length of largest span:	375.0 ft. `[114.3 m]`
Total length:	2745.2 ft. `[836.7 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	126.3 ft. `[38.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	129.9 ft. `[39.6 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	45.9 ft. `[14.0 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1955
Year reconstructed:	2003
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	15
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Girder and floorbeam system `[03]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	73,130 `[as of 2015]`
Truck traffic:	5% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Superior to present desirable criteria `[9]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Pier/abutment protection:	None present but re-evaluation suggested `[5]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	73.0
Recommended work:	Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement `[33]`
Estimated cost of work:	$2,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
March 2017	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	73130	73.0
March 2015	Good	Good	Good	Good	69690	84.0
April 2013	Good	Good	Good	Good	72410	84.0
April 2011	Good	Good	Good	Good	81040	84.0
March 2009	Good	Good	Good	Good	82450	84.0
May 2007	Good	Good	Good	Good	66880	85.0
June 2005	Good	Good	Good	Good	66070	85.0
August 2003	Good	Good	Good	Good	61170	85.0
March 2003	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	61700	85.0
December 2000	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	55100	85.0
March 1999	-	-	-	-	11210	0.0
July 1997	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	60730	73.0
June 1995	Poor	Poor	Good	Good	63860	73.0
April 1993	Poor	Poor	Good	Good	56870	73.0
April 1991	Poor	Serious	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	41080	72.0

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	23,051	23,001	50	0	0
Steel Stringer	linear ft.	22,696	22,681	0	15	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	158,880	158,880	0	0	0
Superstructure
Steel Floor Beam	linear ft.	6,047	6,047	0	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	66	66	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	284	284	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	347	322	20	5	0
Steel Pier Cap	linear ft.	567	567	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	1,545	1,527	18	0	0
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearing	each	12	12	0	0	0
Movable Bearing	each	197	197	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	8,100	8,100	0	0	0