Share: 
FAU 148 over INCLINE TRAM
Map
Coordinates:
+35.00750, -85.33780
35°00'27" N, 85°20'16" W
+35.00750, -85.33780
35°00'27" N, 85°20'16" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | FAU 148 over INCLINE TRAM |
| Structure number: | 33SR1480003 |
| Location: | 1.5 MI. S OF SR-2 JCT. |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
| Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Skew angle: | 10° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1970 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
| Main span design: | Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 3,950 [as of 2015] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.4 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge or other major structure without deck rehabilitation or replacement [33] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $205,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3950 | 75.4 |
| November 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3710 | 75.7 |
| November 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 3290 | 77.1 |
| November 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2760 | 77.8 |
| November 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2960 | 77.5 |
| December 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 3040 | 77.4 |
| March 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 3470 | 76.9 |
| February 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2940 | 77.6 |
| February 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3380 | 77.0 |
| January 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4400 | 75.8 |
| May 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 4320 | 76.9 |
| March 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3900 | 71.0 |
| April 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3880 | 71.0 |
| June 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 3810 | 70.0 |
© Copyright 2012-19, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1502729
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1502729