Share: 
NFA 1334 over BRIAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+36.49948, -83.25753
36°29'58" N, 83°15'27" W
+36.49948, -83.25753
36°29'58" N, 83°15'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | NFA 1334 over BRIAR CREEK |
| Structure number: | 34013340005 |
| Location: | JUST W OFF SR 33 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 15.1 ft. [4.6 m] |
| Total length: | 32.8 ft. [10.0 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1987 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 130 [as of 2018] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4] |
| Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 98.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 130 | 98.0 |
| August 2015 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 130 | 98.0 |
| August 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 98.0 |
| August 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 98.0 |
| September 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 98.0 |
| September 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 130 | 98.0 |
| September 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 120 | 100.0 |
| November 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 120 | 100.0 |
| September 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 320 | 99.9 |
| August 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 160 | 99.9 |
| November 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 160 | 99.9 |
| August 1995 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 350 | 99.9 |
| June 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 300 | 99.9 |
| July 1991 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 250 | 99.9 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1502747
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1502747